• James Berger

“Who Won the 2020 Election?” Is Not the Right Question

On April 10, 1865, President Lincoln spoke to the United States. Violence between North and South still raged. Most Americans, weary of bloodshed, had finally accepted that the Civil War’s most fundamental question had been answered. Lincoln’s own words, delivered long before his ascension to the presidency, had turned out to be true: Just as “a house divided against itself cannot stand,” neither can “government permanently endure half slave and half free.”


This week's still-undecided 2020 election is the latest example that America’s divisions are never fully resolved. Our era of red states and blue states may feel extreme, but history teaches that America has always been grappling with difficult questions.


After four years, everyone knows President Trump’s actions and character. One might wonder how it is possible that half of the country finds his Presidency despicable while we now know the other half is even more devoted than ever?


Agreement, however, has never been a prerequisite for justice or liberty. If we remain vigilant and patient, the votes will be counted. A legitimate winner will emerge. Until then, my suggestion is that the most asked question about this election - “Who won?” - is not the most helpful. Instead, Americans should be asking: “Who do we choose to be?”


That is precisely what Lincoln did when pondering how Americans could overcome their bitterest differences. His answer still resonates in 2020: “The prayers of both sides could not be answered; that of neither has been answered fully.”


America’s Civil War officially ended one month after Lincoln’s speech. An era of imperfect compromise began. What Lincoln recognized is that although America’s Union will never be perfect, we have repeatedly made it “more perfect." Surely, we can do so again.


In that spirit, let us refocus on a question more likely to unite than divide.


Who do we choose to be?

All rights reserved. All content of this blog is the property and copyright of Jia Law Group and may not be reproduced in any format without prior express permission.

Contact marketing@jiaesq.com for more information or to seek permission to reproduce content. This blog is intended for general information purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. The reader should consult with knowledgeable legal counsel to determine how applicable laws apply to specific facts and situations. Blog posts are based on the most current information at the time they are written. Since it is possible that the laws or other circumstances may have changed since publication, please call us to discuss any action you may be considering as a result of reading this blog.

Evaluate your case
arrow&v
Let us know your interest:
Your language preference:
jialawgroupwebpayment.png

E-Verify® is a registered trademark of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security

LOCATIONS

New York Financial District Headquarters

88 Pine Street 18th fl

New York, NY 10005

347 - 897 - 6199

Irvine Office

8 Corporate Park, Ste 300

Irvine, CA 92606

949 - 430 - 6329

New York Flushing Office

136-20 38th Avenue, Ste 3B

Flushing, NY 11354

646 - 500 - 8668

SOCIAL

Instagram.png
Linkedin.png
Facebook.png
YouTube.png
social-wechat-circle-512.png
weibo-icon.png

Pursuant to the amendments to the New York Rules of Professional Conduct governing attorney advertising in New York, this website may constitute advertising. Viewers of this website are advised that: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Attorney Advertising © 2020 Jia Law Group P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com